Effect of Shot Peening on Mechanical Properties for Steel AISI 1008

https://doi.org/10.24237/djes.2019.12205

Authors

  • Mohammed Abdulraoof Abdulrazzaq Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, AL-Mustansiriyah University, Iraq
  • Zeyad D. Kadhim Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, AL-Mustansiriyah University, Iraq
  • Wassan S. Hussain Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, AL-Mustansiriyah University, Iraq

Keywords:

Shot peening, Fatigue properties, Low carbon steel, Surface hardness, Roughness

Abstract

Residual stress has a significant effect for improving engineering properties for metals .Most of the surface treatments produce compressive residual stress at the metal surfaces, which reduce crack initiation and increasing the metal resistance to fatigue, which is shot peening process. Shot peening is usually used for this purpose for producing plastic deformations of surface of the metal which can lead to creation high residual compressive stresses at metal surface .This research include study the influence of shot peening process on fatigue resistance, surface hardness and surface roughness for low carbon steel (AISI 1008). This process accomplished with different times which were (10, 20 and 30(minutes. The result of the fatigue test showed that the fatigue limit increase when shot peening time increased and the best fatigue limit obtained when shot peening process was carried out at 30 minutes. Results of hardness test showed that surface hardness increased with increase of shot peening time. It can be seen that highest value of surface hardness is obtained from shot peening process at time (30 minutes) which is (235.1 HVN). Results of surface roughness test showed that the surface roughness of metal increased when time of shot peening increased.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jack Champaigne "Shot Peening Overview", Electronics Inc 1428 W, 6TH Street Mishawaka, In 46544, January 18, 2001.

P.M. George, NishaPillai, Nisha Shah, Optimization of shot peening parameters using Taguchi technique, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 153-154, 925-930, 2004.

A. N. Abood et.al "Strain Life of Shot Peening AA 2024-T4" Journal of Materials Science Research, Vol. 2, No.1, 2013.

Metal Improvement company "Shot Peening Applications" A Subsidiary of Curtiss-Wright Corporation, ninth edition.

Wagner, L., Luetjering G., "Influence of shot peening on the fatigue behavior of titanium alloys", Proceedings of the 1stInt, Con, SP.,(Paris, France), 1981.

M.A.S. Torres and H.J.C. Voorwald, "An evaluation of shot peening, residual stress and stress relaxation on the fatigue life of AISI 4340 steel", International Journal of Fatigue 24, 877–886, Brazil, October 2001.

S. Van Wijk, M. François and E. Sura, "Shot-Peening of Carbonitrided Steel: Influence of the Process on the Mechanical State", France, 2010.

S.M.H. Gangaraj and G.H. Farrahi, "Side Effects of Shot Peening on Fatigue Crack Initiation life", Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology Tehran, Iran, 15, September, 2011.

Hornbogen, E., Thumann, M. and Verpoort, C. "Influence of shot peening on the fatigue behavior high cycle fatigue properties of a precipitation hardenableaustenitic steel", pp. 381–387, 1981.

Herzog, R., Wohlfahrt, H., Scholtes, B. and Zinn, W., "The significance of Almen intensity for the generation of shot peening residual stresses", in ICSP-6 (San Francisco, USA), pp. 270–281, 1996.

Wang S et al. "Fatigue limits of shot-peened metals", J Mater Process Technol 1998;73:57–63.

W. Shengping, L. Yongjun, Y. Mei, W. Renzhi, "Fatigue limits of shot-peened metals"Journal of Materials Processing Technology 73, 57–63, 1998.M. Guagliano, L. Vergani, "An approach for prediction of fatigue strength of shot peened components", Engineering

Published

2019-06-01

How to Cite

[1]
M. Abdulraoof Abdulrazzaq, Z. D. Kadhim, and Wassan S. Hussain, “Effect of Shot Peening on Mechanical Properties for Steel AISI 1008”, DJES, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 54–64, Jun. 2019.