Influence of Voltage on Pore Water Pressure for Soft Soil Treated with Electro-Osmosis Technique

https://doi.org/10.24237/djes.2023.16208

Authors

  • Ansam M. Wahhab Department of Civil Engineering, University of Diyala, 32001 Diyala, Iraq
  • Qasim A. Aljanabi Department of Civil Engineering, University of Diyala, 32001 Diyala, Iraq
  • Abdulrazzaq Alali Jawish Department of Civil Engineering, University of Jerash, Jordan

Keywords:

Soft soil improvement, Electro osmosis technique, Granular columns, Pore Water Pressure, Various voltage

Abstract

Geotechnical engineers have a difficult time working with soft soils because they require a long time to reach their final settlement and drain water under pressure. Granular columns and other modern technology are only two of the many methods utilised to hasten this levelling. In this study, the alteration of clay soils with a granular column and the evacuation of water by an electric field were replicated using 2D engineering and a finite component. Solid mechanics and electrical interfaces were built using the drag interface. Mohr–Coulomb theory relies on a granular column and fine clay soil at the mechanical contact and employs electro-osmosis to describe a model’s electric field’s impact. For a period of 6 months, the pore water pressure for fine clay soil was calculated. Result showed that when the electric current was applied with a voltage of 5 V, the pwp in soil increased in the first 2 months and then began to decrease gradually, reaching 120 kPa in the sixth month. When the applied voltage was increased to 15 V, the pwp decreased in the first 2 months from the previous ratio of voltage, then it began to decrease gradually and reached 70 kPa in the sixth month. When the applied voltage was further increased to 30 V, the pwp in the soil decreased in the first 2 months from the previous ratios of voltages, then it began to decrease gradually and reached 40 kPa. The percentage of water leaving the soil when an electric current of 5–15 V was applied was 64%. When the voltage was increased to 15–30 V, the value became 75%. That is, as the applied voltage increased, more water was discharged from the soil. The soil settlement also increased with an increase in voltage. The improvement percentage and the percentage of water leaving the soil were 50% at 5–15 V and 71% at 15–30 V.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi, Z W. 2010. “Evaluation of Improvement Techniques for Ballasted Railway Track Model Resting on Soft Clay.”

Guggenheim, Stephen, R. T. Martin, A. Alietti, V. A. Drits, M. L.L. Formoso, E. Galán, H. M. Köster, et al. 1995. “Definition of Clay and Clay Mineral: Joint Report of the AIPEA Nomenclature and CMS Nomenclature Committees.” Clays and Clay Minerals 43 (2): 255–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1995.0430213

Cokca, E. (1999). Effect of fly ash on swell pressure of expansive soil.

Mohammed, M. Z. (2018). Electroosmosis treatment on composite soils (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).

Estabragh, A. R., M. Naseh, and A. A. Javadi. 2014. “Improvement of Clay Soil by Electro-Osmosis Technique.” Applied Clay Science 95: 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.03.019.

Alkhorshid, Nima R., Gregório L.S. Araujo, and Ennio M. Palmeira. 2021. “Consolidation of Soft Clay Foundation Improved by Geosynthetic-Reinforced Granular Columns: Numerical Evaluation.” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 13 (5): 1173–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.03.004

Ali, K., J. T. Shahu, and K. G. Sharma. 2012. “Model Tests on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Stone Columns: A Comparative Study.” Geosynthetics International 19 (4): 292–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.12.00016

Elsawy, M. B.D. 2013. “Behaviour of Soft Ground Improved by Conventional and Geogrid-Encased Stone Columns, Based on FEM Study.” Geosynthetics International 20 (4): 276–85.https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00017

Wu, H., Hu, L., Wen, Q.B. and Hu, L.M., 2017. Analytical solution for electroosmotic consolidation considering the nonlinear variation of soil parameters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000821

Glendinning, S., Jones, C.J. and Pugh, R.C., 2005. Reinforced soil using cohesive fill and electrokinetic geosynthetics. International Journal of Geomechanics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:2(138)

Yang, X., Xie, Y., Dong, J., Liu, G., and Zheng, Y., 2021. Study on Electroosmosis Consolidation of Punctiform Electrode Unit. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6627331

Mitchell, James K. 2005. Behavior Jk Mitchell Amp k Soga Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. Vol. 3.

Manfred. R, Hausmann. 1990. “Engineering Principles of Ground Modification: International Addition.”

Qasim A.,2014 " Behavior Of Stone Column Embedded In Soft Clays Under Embankment By Using Artificial Intelligent Methods " , Ph.D Thesis, Ukm University

Peng, Jie, Hanming Ye, and Akram N. Alshawabkeh. 2015. “Soil Improvement by Electroosmotic Grouting of Saline Solutions with Vacuum Drainage at the Cathode.” Applied Clay Science 114: 53–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.05.012

Wu, H. and Hu, L., 2014. Microfabric change of electro-osmotic stabilized bentonite. Applied Clay Science, 101, pp.503-509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.09.014

Biot, M.A., 1941. The general theory of three‐dimensional consolidation. Journal of applied physics, 12(2), pp.155-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712886

Estabragh, A. R., M. Naseh, and A. A. Javadi. 2014. “Improvement of Clay Soil by Electro-Osmosis Technique.” Applied Clay Science 95: 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.03.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.03.019

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

[1]
A. M. Wahhab, Q. A. Aljanabi, and A. Alali Jawish, “Influence of Voltage on Pore Water Pressure for Soft Soil Treated with Electro-Osmosis Technique ”, DJES, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 87–96, Jun. 2023.